Amid growing social inequality, skyrocketing rents and global crises, centuries-old ideas are gaining new traction: the collective takeover of land, buildings, or businesses by local communities. At the heart of it is the vision to co-own and manage the infrastructure of our daily lives, and ultimately what we call prosperity, as a community. Governed by shared rules, rather than market pressures, intermediaries, or third-party profit interests.
What is a Community Buyout?
Community Buyouts are collective acquisitions of land, houses or jobs and democratically run management structures. This is central to a movement that fundamentally questions our notions of wealth and ownership.
The primary goal of a community buyout is to remove land, resources, rental housing, or workplaces from speculation permanently and managing them for the common good under democratic control. Authority lies with those who live and work there, not investors or distant corporate headquarters.
A Long History of Collective Ownership
The idea behind Community Buyouts isn’t new. For centuries, people have sought alternatives to private or state ownership. Historical examples range from commons and cooperatives to radical experiments in self-governance—like the Paris Commune of 1871. Though lasting only 72 days, it reimagined art, education, labor, and even luxury as shared goods.
The concept of “communal luxury” from that era speaks to shared abundance: beauty, culture, and nature treated as public resources - created to meet human needs, not generate profits.
From Necessity to Luxury
What was once taken for granted - clean water, affordable housing, healthy air - is increasingly becoming a luxury. Even in affluent Western societies, access to basic needs is no longer assured.
At the same time, we live in abundance: consumer goods, entertainment, low-cost travel, fast fashion - what was once special turned into default luxury. Yet real-life pillars of life quality, such stable work, healthcare, education, local food or social safety nets are eroding.
Our idea of prosperity is being reconsidered. What does wellbeing really mean today, and how can prosperity be made accessible to many? This is where the concept of a locally rooted, solidarity-based economy gains momentum. Is there anything collective action can't accomplish?
History says: almost everything can be accomplished when people get organized. The question is just for how long. The Paris Commune lasted two months; anarchist communes in the Spanish Civil War endured for years. Rojava in northern Syria has persisted for over a decade. Germany’s Mietshäuser Syndikat (“Houses for Those Who Live in Them”) has shown since 1999 that long-term collective ownership is possible.
More recent examples such as solidarity clinics in Greece or Occupy Wall Street continue to shape modern visions of democratic, common-good economies. These experiences are far from relics; they offer tools, strategies, and courage for today’s Community Buyout efforts.
Current Models of Collective Ownership
Across Europe and beyond, various initiatives show how Community Buyouts can work in practice:
-
Cooperatives operate on the principle of “one member, one vote,” providing democratic control irrespective of capital contribution. In 2025, the United Nations named it the “International Year of Cooperatives.”
-
Community Land Trusts (CLTs) hold land in trust and lease it to users via long-term charters. This removes land from speculation, prevents displacement, and ensures affordable housing. Berlin’s 2019-founded Stadtbodenstiftung exemplifies this model.
-
Mietshäuser Syndikat is a network of over 200 housing projects in collective ownership, accessing financial solidarity from more established groups to support new initiatives.
-
Workers’ Buyouts see employees taking over businesses through cooperatives, preserving jobs and knowledge. In Germany, companies like oose eG, Roterfaden eG, and Iteratec nurdemteam eG have embraced this model, supported through Platform Coops eG workshops and guidance.
-
Platform Cooperatives democratize digital services like delivery or streaming—examples include Europe’s CoopCycle, Up & Go Coop, Resonate, and The Drivers Cooperative in New York.
-
Rights of Nature initiatives advocate legal personhood for ecosystems like rivers or forests. The Whanganui River in New Zealand is a groundbreaking case, and activists in Germany and Poland are pushing for similar recognition of rivers like the Oder.
-
DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) offer blockchain-based models for collective governance and resource management, complementing traditional structures like cooperatives and trusts by enabling global, trustless collaboration.
What Comes Next?
From early autonomous movements to digital networks, many examples show how resources can be collectively owned and managed. Though often invisible in mainstream culture and lacking economic resilience, community-led projects are real—and multiplying. They need not only funding but political support.
In Germany alone, over 100,000 SMEs require succession in the coming years. That means immense potential for worker-led takeovers. Italy, for instance, created a national mutual fund to support cooperative succession; the UK offers tax breaks via Employee Ownership Trusts. In Germany, while advisory services exist (e.g., via Chambers of Commerce), structural support remains limited.
To make Community Buyouts a viable alternative, we need more than grassroots energy. We need structural, political, and financial frameworks that support collective ownership:
-
Tailored funding programs for community acquisition
-
Legal reforms to facilitate cooperatives, trusts, and hybrid models
-
Educational and advisory services on alternatives to private ownership
-
Public awareness to inspire and connect initiatives
-
Capital aligned with long-term common-good goals, e.g., solidarity funds or credit guarantees
Community Buyouts counter the erosion of social infrastructure, the commercialization of public life, and growing inequality. They open paths toward shared prosperity - built collectively, not at someone else’s expense. But to make them truly effective, we need a political agenda that does more than permit community ownership. It must actively enable it.